Is the “Money Game” Dying in DC?

ChangeCongress-FollowTheMoney696In my last post I decried the incessant corruption in Washington, DC.  I recently read Peter Schweitzer’s amazing book “Extortion” and suddenly I see the baffling events inside the Beltway with new clarity.

Yesterday Speaker of the House John Boehner and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor got 26 other Republican congressmen to join 200 Democrats and pass a “clean” bill to extend the debt limit until after the election.  All the other Republican congressmen sensibly voted against passage.

Today the Senate, with Republican Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Republican Whip John Cornyn voting along with the Democrats, passed the bill for President Obama’s signature.  As a result the national debt will rise to at least $18.2 trillion while our government does nothing but accelerate the calamitous decline in our economy.

Until I read Schweitzer’s book I could not fathom how the Republican leadership of both houses of Congress could vote not only against the wishes and interests of their constituents, but also in defiance of their own body of legislators.  The Republican majority-holding members in the House could have stopped this travesty in a heartbeat, and would have, were it not for John Boehner and the other Republican leaders.   What kind of evil pathology is this?  How can we face our children?

It just didn’t make any sense to me.  Until I learned about “the money”. 

I learned from Schweitzer and subsequent research that the game of government in DC is all about “the money”.  A congressman cannot get elected without “the money”.  Once a candidate is anointed by his party (both teams play by the same rules) and then elected, he is immediately indebted.  He is required to not only raise enough funds to win his own re-election, he also must also raise funds to sustain the party.  And let me tell you, these are some high stakes.

Committee assignments and leaderships are granted to legislators based on the funds they raise.  Votes are bought and sold.   Party leaders can financially make or break any member in a heartbeat.   None of the attributes a congressman brings to his position – knowledge, experience, skill, hard work – matters at all.  One’s status and hope for re-election is solely the result of how much dough he raises for the party.  The vast majority of a legislator’s time is spent chasing “the money”.

While you never hear about this “Lord of the Flies” culture in the press, it is no secret inside the Beltway.  It has been in place for a long, long time.

But a change took root in recent years.  Conservative voters, seeing that the entrenched political class in Washington, DC no longer took any interest in limiting government, supporting constitutional rights, and passing reasonable budgets, began sending principled men and women to the nation’s capital.  These newcomers were less engaged in “the money” and more driven by practical economics and common sense.  As the Tea Party influence became more pronounced, and fewer members feared the leadership’s “protection racket”, the DC money machine started to break down.  The Republican war chest was depleting.  And the central control of the Republican leadership started to crack.

For a candidate, the worst thing about the Tea Party is that they will work hard for you, but they won’t bring you a lot of money.  The best thing is that you won’t have to sell your soul to pay them back.

Boehner and friends have thrown in the towel. From the Huffington Post:

Speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said he “hoped to find 18 of them to join 200 Democrats to get the job done.”

“The fact is, we’ll let the Democrats put the votes up,” Boehner said. “We’ll put a minimum amount of votes up to get it passed.”

The new conservatives don’t care that much about raising money and are not indebted to the leadership.  They voted a resounding NO, and led most of the Republican membership into the light with them.  The old guard Republican leadership hunkered down in their central command, clinging to the hope that they could keep hold of their power and positions, and “the money”, by caving in, again, to their Democrat opponents.  In his final hurrah, Boehner bought just enough votes to do the deal and now he is broken and broke, along with Cantor, McConnell and the others.  “The money”, and the power structure it bought, may soon be extinct.

I hope we will look back at this day as a pivot point.  It was a battle lost, but one that could light the path to winning the war, where true conservatives stand on principle and vote for the people, not “the money”.

(To my Montana friends – The “Responsible Republicans” in the Big Sky State should take note.  Their future may look a lot like that of Boehner and friends.)

Tom Balek – Rockin’ On the Right Side

Rockin' On the Right SideYou never give me your money
You only give me your funny paper
And in the middle of negotiations
You break down!

You Never Give Me Your Money – the Beatles
covered by the Ed Turner Band

4 thoughts on “Is the “Money Game” Dying in DC?

  1. This really doesn’t go with your topic, but I have a question about unemployment. Why doesn’t the government pay employers to hire people instead of paying unemployed people while they look for work. For example, the govt could pay 60% or 75% of a salary for a period of time while the employee goes through training, etc. Eventually, the employer would have to pick up the full salary. It seems simple enough, so I know someone, even a politician, has thought of it. I am asking you because I figure you are smart enough to know why this doesn’t seem feasible. Maybe you can write a blog on it. One thing seems sure, the current program doesn’t seem to be working. Thanks.

    • Thanks for the flattery . . .

      Good theory, Mike, seems like it should work. It has been tried many times in many forms. In fact, I saw a program right there in Lewistown where kids were sent to local companies and the govt. paid their minimum wage for a time, hoping they would stick. For some reason, I can’t explain why, I heard they were always terrible employees. Maybe the employers didn’t take them seriously or give them a real chance. Maybe the reason why the kids were in a govt. program is that they couldn’t get or keep a job on their own, and they were the bottom of the barrel.

      It seems like whenever the government gets in the way of any relationship, whether it is employment, or medical care, or education, or whatever – it just gums up the works. Red tape, stupid rules, bad decisions.

      Government can’t make jobs, or at least any jobs that actually create wealth (govt. jobs are a net negative to GDP). The best and only thing the government can really do to help employment is to have policies that encourage economic growth. Wealth is created by businesses, so the government must do all it can to stay out of the way, or even grease the skids, for business. Good trade policies, reasonable and understandable tax policies, regulations limited to the minimum truly required, support production of energy, good interstate commerce and financial regs, protect the borders, etc. Also the government has to stop discouraging people from working by paying them indefinitely to not work, providing college grants to people who never attend a single class, penalizing people for getting married, paying unmarried moms to have more babies, etc. Destruction of marriage and family is the biggest govt. crime ever, directly related to our ever-declining labor participation rate.

      And what if the feds just let businesses and citizens keep most of the money they earn, instead of taking so much in only to waste half and redistribute the rest? Wouldn’t there be a lot more jobs and prosperity?

      Thanks – good to hear from you. By the way, 6 inches of snow here in the Carolinas today. They are freaking out!

      • Thanks, Tom. I remember that program in Lewistown and have an idea why it didn’t work. You mentioned three reasons. Part of it was they were supposed to earn a GED or diploma if they didn’t have one, but some were too lazy to do that. They were even paid to attend class! I was thinking more of industrious people who needed training for a new job. As for snow back there, lots of people, not enough resources to tackle the overwhelming snow removal problem, and other problems leave them desperate when they get more snow than they can handle. I have relatives in PA who were without power for a few days. That would cause me to panic.Thanks for the reply. Take care out there.

  2. Pingback: Wake Up, Republicans! | Rockin' On The Right Side

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s