Every day, especially during the holiday season, we are buried in news reports about low-income Americans who don’t have enough to eat. There are food drives, community food banks, charity events, and fundraisers galore collecting food and money for food, all based on the premise that the poor just aren’t getting fed.
Contributors to these food charities get a temporary, warm fuzzy feeling. But the whole “starving children” thing is a big sham, and food charity does little or nothing to actually help the poor improve their lives.
Our citizens, through government welfare programs, provide generous food subsidies for the poor. As I reported recently, the SNAP program grants up to $632 per month on EBT debit cards for a qualifying family of four. There are deductions based on income, but cash from most welfare programs is excluded. The monthly SNAP dollar allowance is considerably greater than most non-welfare families spend on food, resulting in high incidence of obesity among SNAP participants. In addition, 68% of students get one or two free or heavily-subsidized meals at school every day.
I’m not saying it’s fun to be on welfare, or that we should abolish all food subsidies. I am saying that lack of food is NOT the main problem for the poor, and providing more food via charities is NOT helping them. The few scarce hungry Americans are victims of neglect, abuse, and mental illness – problems that must be addressed, but in a completely different way.
So why are we so obsessed with providing EVEN MORE FREE FOOD for the poor? Wouldn’t it make more sense to direct this huge pool of charity funds to something that actually does some good?
We could provide economic education, job skills and actual employment opportunities so poor families might escape the sad trap of welfare dependency. We could monitor and counsel poor adults and children, helping develop good decision-making, parenting, and life skills. We could actually get involved at the personal level, helping with individual needs – a car repair so one can get to work; a plane ticket so another can help an ailing relative; a home-cooked meal for a senior who can get food but can’t cook.
This sounds like charity as it once was in this country. Charity that was most often organized by churches. Charity given in the form of time, personal involvement, and caring, in addition to money. Sadly, today’s secular liberal culture discourages faith. Forced charity funded through taxation and administered through soul-less government computers has dried up the river of personal, church-sponsored work that used to actually help people. Now, the extent of our caring for others is reduced to buying them more and more food, making them even fatter, while leaving them dependent on the government and making the same bad choices as their parents and grandparents did. We don’t want to get involved, so let’s throw them another can of food. We can wear ribbons, join a publicized walk to promote “awareness”, and then leave our neighbors behind.
The poor don’t need more food. Frankly, they don’t need that carload of junk from WalMart that many have come to expect from charities every Christmas. They need jobs, and they need guidance from good people – caring and constructive shepherds who can show them the way to a better life.
Tom Balek – Rockin’ On the Right Side
Who can I believe in? I’m kneeling on the floor.
There has to be a force, who do I phone?
The stars are out and shining,
But all I really want to know –
Oh, won’t you show me the way?
I want you to show me the way.
5 thoughts on “The Poor Don’t Need More Food”
Right on Tom. People can make sandwiches for their children as our parents did for us. By todays standards most of us were “poor” in the fifties but our parents made our lunch and taught us to be independent. Today charity has become big business and students are taught to be dependent rather than independent. Government programs bring corporations money but they don’t bring individuals to success in life. Education Lady
Tom, sometimes you make so much sense that I agree with you. The poor often made bad choices that put them where they are. They need training or educational skills that will help them improve their lives. You are right; the food will be there.
Hmmm, Their are people living in woods ,with kids,kids that are still enrolled in school, These kids have to eat. I agree with 99% of what you write, but this time I just can’t. I live in Florida, I have seen so many people and have even talked to some, Some are poor and on the streets due to parents losing a job because they had a doctor appointment or maybe their disabled and cant find work,and then losing the home , the car, then everything, but they still have their children they need to feed, I don’t so much feel for the parents as I do the kids. Its not their fault. So yes I think these food drives and funding needs to be kept up. Just my opinion, I;m not an expert but you need food to live.
I understand, Tina – I worry about the kids, too. But here’s the problem: the govt. provides over $600 a month for food for a family of four, plus free meals at school. How much more food can we shove at people? If somebody who needs food is NOT getting the govt. food, then that program should be evaluated and improved. The problem is, many people get and eat all of that food, now weigh 300 lbs., and we continue to throw potato chips at them to make ourselves feel better. Why don’t we work on improving the economy and improving their ability to make and enjoy quality lives for themselves and their families? They don’t need more potato chips and junk food! Here’s the sad but honest truth: In this day and age, with all the government help available out there, if a kid is going hungry he/she should be taken away from the parent(s) because it is clearly abuse and negligence.
Pingback: Sign Up Now for ObamaCar – Subsidized Car Insurance! | Rockin' On The Right Side