There she was, across from Chris Wallace. Her taught facial lines belied her 73 years, her posture was perfect, and her bright eyes and smile registered a ten on the energy scale.
It was when she opened her mouth that things went awry.
Early in the interview, she called Chris Wallace “Bill”. (It was removed from the Fox transcript to prevent embarrassment to Wallace – see this YouTube video and skip to the 4:00 mark.)
(Update – Fox transcript now says “Here’s the thing though . . .” On Sunday two of us thought we heard “Here’s the thing, Bill” independently — it appears we were both wrong. – Tom)
Wallace asked her why she can’t cut $85 billion (2%) out of the government’s $3.5 trillion budget. Her response: “Well, we have cut in terms of agriculture subsidies, there are tens of billions of dollars in cuts there and that should be balanced with eliminating subsidy for big oil. Why should we do — why should we lower Pell Grants instead of eliminating the subsidies for big oil?”
Wallace pressed her again: “Why not just cut spending? Eighty-five billion dollars in a $3.5 trillion government.”
Her response: “The fact is that a lot of the spending increases came during the Bush administration. Two unpaid for wars we got ourselves engaged in. A prescription drug plan that added enormous amounts to our spending, and the tax cuts at the high end that did not create jobs and create revenue coming.”
Why didn’t you move to end funding for the wars, repeal the prescription drug benefit plan, and reverse the tax cuts when you were Speaker of the House and your party also held the presidency and the Senate? And what does a former president, after four years of retirement, have to with the current federal budget (or lack thereof)?
When Wallace pointed out that the top 5% pay 59% of all federal taxes, Pelosi said she doesn’t want to raise taxes again on the wealthy. Then she blurted, “We also have the Buffett Rule which says all of the high income people would pay a minimum of — they would have to pay — ”
Wallace: “So, you’re raising tax on the wealthy.”
Pelosi: “No, you are saying they should pay their fair share, which is 30 percent, which is even lower than 39.6, which is the rate — the bracket they are in.”
Nancy was becoming more flustered and incoherent by the minute.
Then Wallace asked for her position on gun control. Her answer was beyond bizarre:
“No further sales of the increased capacity, 30 rounds in a gun. We are talking about background checks which is very popular, even among gun owners, and, hunters. We avow the First Amendment, we stand with that, and say that people have a right to have a gun to protect themselves in their homes and their jobs, whatever. And that they — and their workplace — and that they, for recreation and hunting and the rest.”
Is it possible she doesn’t know that the right to bear arms is granted in the Second Amendment? Or have all those years of “inside the Beltway” cocktail parties just made her “comfortably numb?”
I don’t wish to make light of senility. Alzheimer’s is a serious problem.
Maybe it should also be a disqualifier for a seat in Congress.
Tom Balek – Rockin’ On the Right Side
Bill! I love you so, I always will . . .
I was on your side Bill when you were losin’,
I’ll never scheme or lie Bill, there’s been no foolin’!
Wedding Bell Blues – Marilyn McCoo
the Fifth Dimension
written by Laura Nyro
One thought on “Nancy Pelosi – Alzheimers Victim?”
In a way you have to feel bad for the Dems – congenital stupidity must hurt. I heard Steny Hoyer yesterday on CNBC say, “We don’t have a spending problem, we have a paying for problem.” WTF?!?!?!?!
My new favorite saying, “I’m not saying you’re stupid. I’m just saying you’ve got bad luck when it comes to thinking.”