Montanans Don’t Care About Their Kids

What do you want your child to be able to do when he or she becomes an adult?

Let me guess:  How about “make a good living, have a nice home, raise a family?”  Perhaps “have a comfortable lifestyle without being burdened with debt and insecurity?”  Maybe “save some money for a comfortable retirement?”

You may have other, more fuzzy aspirations for your child, such as “happiness” or “love” or “fulfillment”.  But I’ll bet the items I mentioned above are at the top of your list.

Then why have you and I and every Montana parent not DEMANDED that our schools teach our children about money?

Except those who are on welfare, or are retired, or are so disabled that they are excluded from work, every American wakes up each morning and sets out to improve his or her family’s standard of living.  It’s the essence of life.  We have wants and needs, and we strive to fulfill them within the economic system in which we live.  One would think that our education system would be geared toward that top priority of life, and our children would leave school with a fundamental working knowledge of the role of money, finance, and economics in our free-market democratic republic.

But no.  Our state requires high school students to learn mathematics, language skills, social studies, science, health, art, world languages, and vocational/technical studies.  An extensive array of fine arts is recommended.  But my search of the Montana Office of Public Instruction website did not find the word “economics” mentioned EVEN ONCE.

The OPI website includes numerous articles trumpeting the importance of Indian studies, but none about how to make our Native American students financially successful and independent.

Can you name one human activity that does not involve money?

Can you guess how many high school athletes become professional athletes?  Basketball: .03% .   Football: .09%.   We know how much attention and money is paid to those pursuits.

But how many high school students will need to earn a paycheck or make a profit, file a tax return, handle financial transactions with confidence, understand how their government handles their money, buy insurance, manage a family budget, make intelligent borrowing, saving, and investing decisions?  100%.

(By the way, most professional athletes are bankrupt within a few years of the end of their playing careers, because they weren’t taught economics in school either.)

Some Montana schools offer consumer economics classes or a make a minimal attempt at teaching economics within other courses.  But I’ll bet the participation rate is miniscule where offered.

The biggest failure in our education system is the refusal to provide our children the financial literacy they need to thrive and survive.  As we continue to matriculate generation after generation of walking economic victims, our nation flounders in debt, our dependency on government explodes, and we elect whichever pandering politician promises to give us the most free “stuff”.

One can only conclude that Montana parents either haven’t seriously thought about the importance of economics, or they think their kids are destined to become professional athletes.  Either way, the kids are screwed.

Tom Balek – Rockin’ On the Right Side

We don’t need no education
We don’t need no thought control
No dark sarcasm in the classroom
Teachers leave those kids alone

Another Brick In the Wall – Pink Floyd

3 thoughts on “Montanans Don’t Care About Their Kids

  1. So, how would you recommend the inclusion of financial (money) instruction within the educational setting? As a parent of students who are now attending college, my daughters’ experience with financial instruction was briefly touched on in a consumer science classroom (home ec). With the new Common Core Standards adoption, local control is lost. I must agree, financial instruction is necessary!

    • I believe so strongly in the need for financial literacy, that I would include it as a required course of study, just like math, science, and history. I think a course in eighth grade and another course in high school would be in order, and advanced high school courses should be available.

      That may sound extreme, but look where our lack of citizen economic understanding has left us! I believe it is an imperative not only for personal success, but for our collective success as a nation.

      Some will say that there isn’t time enough in the school day to add more required content. I would counter that a great deal of the current pseudo-academic and extracurricular time-wasting content could be dropped in exchange for something this important.

      There are some texts and curricula developed for this purpose, but more development is in order there. Frankly, without any requirement for financial education, materials haven’t been fully developed yet. But it shouldn’t take long to correct that.

      Sandy Welch supports economic education, and that (plus other issues) makes her my choice for Montana State Superintendent, OPI.

  2. Right on Tom! See my blog “Please Release Us Let Us Go”- we need freedom in American education. Our curriculums are bogged down with social justice instead of how to live and compete successfully in our capitalist economy. Parental choice will change a lot of these things. The Education Lady

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s